|
Rep. Geoff Simpson, serving the 47th District Serving part of southeast King County from the Renton Highlands to Kent to Black Diamond. |
February 16, 2009
OLYMPIA -- Before taxpayers are on the hook for $4 billion – or
possibly three times more – independent experts should look at plans for
a tunnel to replace the Alaskan Way Viaduct. That's the message behind a
proposed law introduced by Rep. Geoff Simpson (D-Covington), a member of
the House Transportation Committee.
"With the recession getting
worse, I don't believe we should be buying the most expensive, least
studied and riskiest of all the options," Simpson said. "This bill
safeguards the taxpayers' money by having independent experts look at
the tunnel scheme so that any decision made is based on facts, not
politics."
Simpson's legislation
(House Bill 2217) would require the Washington State Transportation
Commission to appoint an independent team of experts to analyze and
report on the soundness of the financing plan and feasibility of the
proposed tunnel. The panel's findings would be due by September 2009.
Simpson questioned the decision-making process that led to the selection
of the deep bore tunnel in January, considering it was not even
considered an option in December, had been described as "irresponsible"
by the Governor a year ago and was rejected by Seattle's citizens in an
advisory vote.
"When more than $4 billion of taxpayers' money is at
stake," Simpson said, "we should have more credible information than a
proposal from a think-tank known for controversial views."
Simpson
stressed the need to move forward with a replacement option for the
viaduct but believes with so much taxpayer money at risk, the tunnel
idea needs a closer look. Citing the Washington State Department of
Transportation's project-estimating manual, Simpson said that at this
level of only 1 percent design, it's typical to have the project
ultimately cost as much as 200 percent more than current estimates.
"The more money we sink into a tunnel in Seattle," Simpson said, "the
less we have available to fund needed projects in South King County,
Pierce County and eastern Washington. Why should we buy a Cadillac when
all we have is a Chevy budget?"